My Thought: Perak Constitutional Conundrum

Promoting Shari’ah-compliant finance violates the United States Constitution: In the Case of Kevin J. Murray v Henry M. Paulson, Jr
February 1, 2009
My Story: A Journey Begins
February 20, 2009
Promoting Shari’ah-compliant finance violates the United States Constitution: In the Case of Kevin J. Murray v Henry M. Paulson, Jr
February 1, 2009
My Story: A Journey Begins
February 20, 2009
Show all

My Thought: Perak Constitutional Conundrum

Assalamualaikum,

Dear Readers,

It has been quite sometime that I have not pen down my thought on Malaysian politic. From my personal observation, money politics, corruption, accusation, cronyism and unethical norms of the politicians become mundane in the Malaysian political arena. I am not sure whether the sense of brotherhood, nationhood, solidarity is still embedded in the heart of the politicians. People put their eminent hopes to the politicians but it seems that they are just too busy with their political pinata.

Let me briefly analyse the current constitutional conundrum in Perak. Soon after the betrayal of PKR’s duo (coincidently, unfortunately and shamefully, one of them is from my constituency) and DAP’s assemblyman, the Perak’s Chief Minister has requested the Sultan to dissolve the State Assembly and called for snap poll while the Barisan Nasional claimed to form a new government. This position has led to constitutional dilemma and ultimately, the Sultan of Perak (retired Chief Justice) has decided to refuse the Chief Minister’s application because he had lose the confidence of the majority of the State Assembly members. It is worth highlighting two main views on this current constitutional issue:-

(1) The Sultan should dissolve the State Assembly and calls for a new election.
Perak state constitution: Artikel XVI(6): If the Mentri Besar ceases to command the confidence of the majority of the Legislative Assembly, then unless at his request His Royal Highness dissolves the Legislative Assembly, he shall tender the resignation of the Executive Council.
This provision states that the Chief Minister is only legally obliged to step down when a motion of no confidence on him has been passed in the state assembly, but not otherwise.

(2) Unnecessary election should be avoided and the Sultan has his discretionary or prerogative power to decide.
At this point, I tend to concur with Prof Dr Abdul Aziz Bari of International Islamic University of Malaysia (IIUM) where he said that several provisions in the Constitution indicated that unnecessary elections and by-elections should be avoided. It is for the Sultan who has power to decide whether to dissolve the State Assembly or not. As long as any political coalition has the composition to form a new government, unnecessary election should be avoided which may lead to furthering unneeded cost, time and efforts. Whatever it is, the people of Perak have opportunity to decide and cast their votes in the 13th general election and this constitutional conundrum should provide a great lesson to both disputed parties. Just a matter of waiting for another few years.

“THERE ARE NO TRUE FRIENDS IN POLITICS. WE ARE ALL SHARKS CIRCLING AND WAITING FOR TRACES OF BLOOD TO APPEAR IN THE WATER”. (ALAN CLARK 1928-1999)

Best Regard
ZULKIFLI HASAN
DURHAM UNIVERSITY

  • p8190013
  • With Yang Amat Berhormat, Datuk Dr. Zambry Abdul Kadir, a new Chief Minister of Perak (second from right) in Cape Town, South Africa. It is a great hope regardless of political ideology that he can serve the people well with integrity and honesty.

    Leave a Reply

    SUBSCRIBE

    Get the latest posts delivered to your mailbox:

    Page Reader Press Enter to Read Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Pause or Restart Reading Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Stop Reading Page Content Out Loud Screen Reader Support